In this paper I intend to advocate
a multi-tiered approach to analysing Plato’s allegory of the cave and its
symbolism using the narrative nature of the allegory. Following the path of the
philosopher, one can elucidate three main commentaries from Plato: a social
commentary on the behavior of Athens, a spiritual commentary on the journey of
the soul (better expanded in later dialogues), and finally a commentary on the
philosopher himself, along with the proper ways to practice philosophy. Important
factors and symbols to note will include the captives themselves, the shadows,
shadow makers, manner of freedom, fire, ascent, and sun, all within the
narrative framework of the individual’s journey, and re-evaluated for each leg—so
to speak—of the trip. It is my ultimate
goal to demonstrate that the proper practice of philosophy intersects with and
is inseparable from these three—social, spiritual, and philosophically minded—aspects
of one’s life and situation.
I think this will make a great paper. Your presentation of the ideas in class was really interesting.
ReplyDeleteOne thing that I found confusing about the abstract was that the practice of philosophy seems to be the meta-narrative, but it is also one of the three more specific aspects. I can see that social, spiritual, and philosophical aspects of life all play vital roles in the practice of philosophy. So, I think that it might be helpful to reword the last sentence to bring out the idea a little more clearly.
Bryant, I forget how you fleshed out the details of each leg, so I don't know how apropos this thought is. I was thinking about the elements of the ascent you talk about and noting that you didn't mention the philosopher's return to the cave. Is there anything significant/interesting you might think about in that regard as you develop the social, spiritual, and philosophical journeys. Is there a distinct return to the cave in each of these ways?
ReplyDeleteI very much like your overall idea that you iterate at the end, and am interested to see the finished product here.
I thought I had responded to your abstract, but I guess i didn't hit return. Anyway, I think it will make a good paper, sufficiently well focused on a small section of text that can show us the richness and complexity of what is at work.
ReplyDelete